What's The Deal With Believers Hating On Atheists?

Saturday, January 8, 2011 | |

Holier than thou comes to mind.


Hate is a very anti-Godly sentiment. I'm not sure of any passages in the Bible that suggest Christians hate anything, or anyone. There is something about loving one another though. Actually, that's in there a whole lot.

Believers are Good because God requires it. Evil, or bad people go to hell, so believers are sort of scared into doing good deeds and being good. And apparently condemning those less good than they, ironic, no?

Atheists are good, not as an afterlife styled reward, but for a moral reward, for being fair and good to their fellow man, regardless of their creed.

Why do believers assume that atheists are bitter about death and not having a heaven? I would think not having a Heaven would lead atheists to lead fuller, happier, more meaningful lives. Believers don't believe their soul ends at death, the more meaningful life for them, therefore, is in the afterlife, in eternity. Human life, as we know it, is merely a waiting period to see if one is worthy of that afterlife. For non believers, though, this Earthly life bears much more consequence, and they are forced to live a good life. Not necessarily a better life mind you. Believers and non believers are no better than one another. just different in their opinions.

Believers find hope, joy, and meaning in God, in the Bible (His Words), and in His message. A message filled with wisdom such as "Be good to one another," "Don't hate," "Be honest, loving people," and so on. Nonbelievers find meaning in similar sentiments, they just aren't based on any type of theologic doctrine of any belief in a God or gods. Being good for goodness' sake, comes to mind.

Rewards aren't always the best catalyst for good deeds. Doing so likens us to animals-- getting treats for behaving and punished for disobeying. But we are more than just animals, wouldn't you think? We ought to think better of ourselves. Sometimes being good is it's own reward. If I'm passing by an accident and stop to help, should I be doing so to gain favor from God, or because those people really might need the help? (Of course, sometimes helping just gets in the way of firefighters, and other emergency responders, so do keep that in mind!)

Atheists don't even generally hate on religions or God as a whole. Yes, some do, and they're morons. I don't think your average nonbeliever looks at religious people with disdain or pity. I think that they generally accept religious people's belief system as one that gives them meaning and joy. Atheists don't snicker or belittle them, they just don't get anything gratifying from praying to a God they don't believe exists. I would think believers would appreciate that nonbelievers don't pray to a God they don't believe in. To me, that would be more offensive.

Pretending is far worse than not participating. I'm not a religious person, so I don't attend church or anything like that. But if my presence is requested at a church for a wedding or a baptism, I'm not going to say no. My presence there means more to those who invited me than my unease about being in a church. And that trepidation isn't that I'm scared of not having an afterlife or anything, it's because I don't intend any disrespect to those who fervently believe in that religion's teachings and beliefs. But I am respectful, always. I've grown up going to private, Catholic schools, so I know the traditions. I don't pretend to adhere to them when I'm at a baptism or wedding, instead I participate. In the event I'm invited to, not the religious aspects of it. If I were asked to be a Godparent to someone, I'd inform them of my beliefs, and make sure they understood that my being a Godparent, would not be religious, but physical. I'd be whatever was required of me.

Nonbelievers don't attack religious people, or believers in God (in general). They don't even attack God. I think the most angry, and vocal voices tend to be against how believers treat other believers. Atheists tend to argue against the establishment when the establishment acts, shall we say, less than humane. Often, this is a voice of support to those who might not get much, and it's probably from the last place expected. Televangelists who take advantage of their constituents, Muslim women who are mistreated and beaten, Catholic priests who get transferred after being accused of molesting children. These are all events that tend to incite the more fervent anger from atheists, not the fact that some people believe in a God atheists don't believe in.

We should all just be good people. Treat others well and with respect, and it will be returned. We don't need any of that holier than thou crap; it gets us nowhere.

1 comments:

Kaulean said...

I think the problem is that people aren't inherently good. Religion is kind of a way to keep the masses in line. You give them a set of rules to follow and threaten them with eternal damnation if they don't follow the rules. I really am not a big fan of organized religion. I drive past megalithic churches with money coming out of the bricks, and then I'll see a slum with children not getting enough to eat just blocks away. That is just sickening to me. Just as bad as missionaries who go to 3rd world countries and bring the promise of food and medicine, just so long as the natives listen to their Christian stories and consider conversion. Why can't they just give with no strings attached? Religion has killed more people than non-believers ever will.

I don't mean that people shouldn't have faith, but organized religion is not faith. It's a method of control. A necessary evil? Perhaps considering people need to be given rules or chaos ensues. That being said I still can't see it as anything other than laughable.